A scored, sized backlog
Two hundred submitted ideas become a ranked portfolio once there is a scoring model and a capacity model behind it. Ranking by evidence rather than volume is what keeps month seven as productive as month one.
A center of excellence is not a team with a name. It is an intake process, a scoring model, a set of gates, a reusable technical foundation and a standard for what “done” means. We have stood these up inside Fortune 200 manufacturers and global services firms.
Two hundred submitted ideas become a ranked portfolio once there is a scoring model and a capacity model behind it. Ranking by evidence rather than volume is what keeps month seven as productive as month one.
Fourteen impressive demos, none in production, because nobody defined what production readiness means or who owns a solution after go-live.
The COE exists but every solution requires the partner who built it. Reuse is zero, cost per use case never falls, and the exit gets more expensive each year.
A structured way to propose work and a scoring model on value, feasibility, data readiness, risk and reuse. Ranked lists, capacity-aware, defensible in a steering meeting.
Five gates from qualified idea to scaled production, each with named exit criteria, an accountable owner and a kill decision that is genuinely available.
flexday.ai as the shared platform: ontology, connectors, patterns, components and evaluation harness. This is what makes solution five cheap.
What accuracy must be proven, what must have a human in the loop, what documentation risk and audit require, what a model card contains.
Who does what: federated business ownership, central platform and standards, embedded builders. Plus how solutions are supported after go-live.
Your people trained on the platform and paired on live work. Measured by how much of the portfolio they lead, not by attendance.
Named business owner, articulated value, plausible data. Most submissions stop here, which is the point.
Data access confirmed, ontology sketched, pattern identified, effort estimated with a real number.
Working solution, golden set built, accuracy measured against an agreed threshold. Not a demo.
Security and risk sign-off, monitoring, support model, named owner, change process, rollback plan.
Adoption and benefit measured against the G1 case. Reusable components harvested for the next build.
Every candidate is scored on five dimensions with defined anchors, so a score means the same thing across functions. In a recent transportation program this reduced a large use-case inventory to three per business area, and those nine carried a commitment to show measured results within 180 days.
| DIMENSION | WHAT IT ASKS |
|---|---|
| Value | Hours, dollars or risk removed, quantified by the business owner, not by us |
| Feasibility | Does the pattern exist, is the reasoning within reach, how much is genuinely novel |
| Data readiness | Does the data exist, can we access it, and does it actually contain the answer |
| Risk | Regulatory exposure, consequence of a wrong answer, human oversight required |
| Reuse | What does this leave behind that makes the next three use cases cheaper |
Measured by how much of the portfolio your people lead, and by whether cost per use case actually falls.